Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | P. K. Geevarghese |
Date: | Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:32:37 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Professor Oglesby:
I agree with you and support you. How can we maintain a healthy mind without
a healthy body? PE is just as important as any other type of education!
Professor Geevarghese
At 02:16 PM 2/26/04 -0500, Burch Oglesby wrote:
>It is unfortunate that we are having to make these difficult choices. It is
>truly a no win situation. As you might well expect based on my position in
>EHLS, I am an advocate of the physical education requirement. We as a
>campus have already made a statement concerning our individuality by
>keeping the statistics class in general education as this is not part of
>the TBR 41. I would ask that we make another statement by keeping the
>physical education requirement. I am under the impression that programs
>which cannot meet the 120 hour rule due to accreditation standards will be
>allowed to require additional hours. Additionally, many programs have
>integrated several hours of general education or university requirements
>within their degrees. We have used this approach. If a program such as
>nursing feels that they meet either or both the knowledge and activity
>components for the physical education requirement then they should be
>allowed to petition for an exemption. Will requiring this course save the
>state from a TennCare bankruptcy, probably not? However, it does have the
>possibility of helping a student live a long healthy life. The solutions to
>problems such as health and health care are done one step at a time. It is
>my hope we will take a step forward and not a step backward. Thank you for
>your consideration of this important issue.
>
>Sincerely
>
>Burch Oglesby
>
>
>
>
>Burch Oglesby, Jr. Ph.D.
>Dept. of Exercise Science, Health, and Leisure Studies
>Arena 212 - Dept. #6606
>Univ. of Tennessee at Chattanooga
>615 McCallie Ave.
>Chattanooga, TN 37403
>423-425-5214
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
|
|
|