On Sun, 2 Jul 2000 10:11:36 -0100
Kuty <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> At 03:41 02/07/00 -0400, Feesh wrote:
> >Go to   http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/scuba-l.html
> >
> >Click on the Archive Search option,
> >you'll find TWO POSTS by Kuty, dated July 7, 2000,

Bob, the attributions should have been the giveaway.
At 13:14 06/01/00 -0500, Carl wrote:
and
At 22:14 04/01/80 +0100, Giovanni wrote:

Try viewing the whole thread of "Happy Y2K EveryBuddy!" for the period
Jan 2000 week 1...... they are both there well ahead of their date
header, how can that be????    ;-)

The web based view that Bob has become so fond of only displays minimal
headers. Is this minimalist header limitation going to cramp Bob's
accurate analysis in the future? :)

> Ah, the woders of cyber space.  The server of scuba-l can predict the
> future.  It knows that I will be subscribed again to scuba-l by July 7th
> 2000 (today is July 2nd 2000 and I am still unsubscribed).  Moreover, it
> knows that I will club Carl on one post and Gio on the other.

Bob should have looked a little deeper... as I have said those posts
have been around since Jan 7th!
I bet they are on Bob's BHD since he was getting Scuba-L mail back then.

Was the subject a giveaway?.... was Kuty hit by Y2K bug or just testing
something in the future?

Headers tell the true story...........
From:Kuty <[log in to unmask]>
To:[log in to unmask]
Subject:Re: Happy Y2K EveryBuddy!
Date:Fri, 7 Jul 2000 00:44:25 +0300
X-Priority:3
Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
Envelope-to: [log in to unmask]
Delivery-date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:50:19 -0500
Received: from firewall.nite.org.il [xx.x.xx.xx]
 by nt-mail.nite.org.il
 with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id Z83MGZAW;
 Thu, 6 Jan 2000 23:43:40 +0200
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> >So, Scuba-L is SNAFU, again!

Me-thinks it was Kuty's PC that was SNAFU way back when.


Michael
--
Divers know the true meaning of peace of mind.