On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:45:29 -0500, Huw Porter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:06:43 -0500, Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>
>>> Currently having a pleasant exchange with Popeye.
>>
>>I'll bet.  My last response to him regarding you was that you really
>>are a pretty good diver.  It didn't help.

That's Lee's modus operandi:  after having done the most hedious
act and gratuitous "cheap and BLIND shots" (at me), Lee would
interject a atatemet of "compliment" that is irrelevant to the
act or subject, in an obviously insincere way, in an attempt
to create the false impression that Lee is FAIR in his acts and
comments.


Deja vu all over again, as Yogi would say.


>>If you wish to stop the discussion, avoid anything to do with U.S.
>> military actions anywhere outside the U.S.   It's even more of
>> a hotbutton for him than it was for me a while back.
>
>I don't normally get involved in these threads, entertaining though they
>are (as a one-man self-created freakshow) from the outside, but the
>outstanding, record setting level of hypocracy contained in this response
>is just breathtaking.  Sinking this low must deserve some recognition,
>surely?  :-)
>
>Cheers,
>Huw

I agree, Huw.

The naming of the "title" of the "recognition" to properly reflext
the depth of the abyss would be a most challenging task.

-- Bob.