Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 24 May 2002 14:17:31 +0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
OK, you guys have got me to rethink the hose issue. I can see the
point.
Steve Catron was saying that the 5' hose works for him looped without a
canister, but Lee and Strike are saying 6'. I guess I'll do some
experimenting with some line to see how different lengths might work
for me. Thanks for the advice.
Robert Delfs
On Thu, 23 May 2002 14:14:07 -0400, Lee Bell wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>Not to change your mind, but the long hose has other advantages. Even in
>open water, it's easier to share, particularly when sharing is a convenience
>rather than a necessity, like for a minor gear adjustment or just so my wife
>can stay with me during the deco stop I carelessly incurred while she was
>being more reasonable. The biggest advantages for non cavers are
>streamlining and anti snagging issues. The long hose remains closer to the
>body and helps with both. If I had waited until I needed a new hose, I'd
>still be waiting. I have quite a few spares in that same closet.
>
>..[snip]
>
>I would not suggest a 5 foot hose. That would be too short for me. I like
>the 6 foot one I'm using and I'm sure a 7 footer would be OK too.
Robert Delfs
Reply to: <[log in to unmask]>
Tel: +852 2812-6290
Fax: +852 2812-6970
|
|
|