SCUBA-SE Archives

May 2002

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Delfs <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 May 2002 14:17:31 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
OK, you guys have got me to rethink the hose issue.  I can see the
point.

Steve Catron was saying that the 5' hose works for him looped without a
canister, but Lee and Strike are saying 6'.  I guess I'll do some
experimenting with some line to see how different lengths might work
for me.  Thanks for the advice.

Robert Delfs

On Thu, 23 May 2002 14:14:07 -0400, Lee Bell wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>Not to change your mind, but the long hose has other advantages.  Even in
>open water, it's easier to share, particularly when sharing is a convenience
>rather than a necessity, like for a minor gear adjustment or just so my wife
>can stay with me during the deco stop I carelessly incurred while she was
>being more reasonable.  The biggest advantages for non cavers are
>streamlining and anti snagging issues.  The long hose remains closer to the
>body and helps with both.  If I had waited until I needed a new hose, I'd
>still be waiting.  I have quite a few spares in that same closet.
>
>..[snip]
>
>I would not suggest a 5 foot hose.  That would be too short for me.  I like
>the 6 foot one I'm using and I'm sure a 7 footer would be OK too.


Robert Delfs
Reply to:  <[log in to unmask]>
Tel:    +852 2812-6290
Fax:   +852 2812-6970

ATOM RSS1 RSS2