Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 16 Mar 2002 21:54:41 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 22:29:07 -0500
> Reply-To: SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
> Sender: SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
> From: Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [SCUBA-SE] Travel to Cozumel
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Chuck wrote:
>
> > And therein is the crux of the matter. The FAA sets a minimum standard
> to
> which the airlines must conform. It is a MINIMUM and they are free to
> add
> to it what they see fit. That is their right under our system.
>
> I know I'm being picky here, but they are authorized to make the rules just
> as I and my office are authorized to make them in our industry. In neither
> case is it a right and in both cases, there is considerable oversight and
> penalties for misuse of the authority. If I were feeling particularly
> contentious, had nothing better to do, and had more money than good sense,
> I
might challange even the FAA's authority relative to firearms. Tilting
> at
windmills can be fun, but it's rarely productive. Even if I were
> willing to
> try, I have no basis to challance either the FAA's or the Airlines rules
> regarding pressurized tanks. My only options are to find out what they are
> and make the best of them or vote with my feet.
>
> Lee
>
Just returned from CZM. The round trip was made with pony in checked
luggage. The valve was in place with a non-zero, non-regulated (< 30 psi)
pressure.
They didn't ask and I didn't tell on the way to CZM. My bags were searched
at check-in on the way home. As the pony was on top, they couldn't miss it.
I was never required or requested to remove the valve or give up the pony.
No one asked about the pressure.
Signing off now...
-- kc
P.S. Tilting at windmills is productive when one is in the right.
|
|
|