Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 29 Sep 2002 07:28:22 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:57:13 +1000, David Strike <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Bugger! :-)))
>(snip)
>
>> >With his knack for spotting critters, Julian discovered two large
>flathead
>
>> Crocodilefish? :-) For does it have to be a PAINTED flathead?
>
>Now this is a strange one! :-)
That's because I misconstrued your conversation with Lee to mean that
a "painted flathead" either looks like a crocfish or is the synonym of
a crocfish:
LB> >Be forceful . . . it was
LB> > definitely a crocodilefish . . . what's one look like?
>
DS> Like a painted flathead!
Glad my remark gave you a chance to revise my mistaken image from what
Ichtyologist Strike said on the previous occasion. :-)))
>In one book, 'Sea Fishes of Southern Australia', the closest looking
>specimen - to what I've been calling a, 'Painted Flathead' - is called a,
>'Tassel-Snouted Flathead'. Wheras the picture and description in, 'Coastal
>Fishes of South-Eastern Australia' refer to it as a 'Rock Flathead'. (A
>name and image that, in the first book, looks nothing like the picture and
>certainly doesn't match the description, of the critter in the second book -
>and neither of which have the more elongated snout of the thing that we
>see!!) :-))))
Bugger! :-)))
-- Bob.
|
|
|