SCUBA-SE Archives

February 2006

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reef Fish <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SCUBA or ELSE! Diver's forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:59:50 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (85 lines)
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 07:08:13 -0500, Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>> You should have addressed your question to Mika.
>
>I did.  You're just not smart enough to get it.

No, you are too dumb to get my reverse sarcasm of your dumb 
statement, which you obviously thought was your cleverness:

>Bob, does Michael know you're posting in his name?
>
>Lee

You threw out the chum, you got your ass bitten by the grouper.  :-)

And you returned for MORE, with what you thought would excuse
your stupidity!   Now THAT's not very smart of you, DING DONG!
>
>
>> Below is the most recent episode involving Lee Bell's stupidity:
>>
>> I made a comment in the rec.scuba.locations group in the thread
>> "The world's best Top 10 destinations" and mentioned one of my
>> least favorite, the Florida Keys.
>>
>> Lee, in his over-inflated head said my dislike of Florida Keys
>> was because of my dislike of Lee Bell
>
>So, you posted this here because of your great love and respect for me?

If that's how YOU took it, then your "over-inflated" fat head
has been validated.

>
>You seem to have overlooked your claim that I was on no scuba forum before
>1995, backed by your research of a system that did not include information
>for the period you claimed to have researched and your dodging when you 
were
>informed of what you already should have known, that I met my wife on a
>scuba forum in the 1980s.

That was the kind of irrelevant obfuscation that you thought could
fool anyone, and you indeed brought out some of the Dysfunctional
Gang troops lining behind your stupidity, until THIS was posted
(which Lee Bell cleverly snipped to put in his preceding paragraph):

===========
2.  I did not even dislike Lee until about 2000 when he had PROVEN 
     by then that he is nothing but an obfuscating "arguer" on his 
     mistakes. 

3.  By simple logic, if I stated some opinion about something because 
     I disliked Lee Bell, it would necessarily have occurred AFTER 
     2000. 

So, anyway you members of the Dysfunctional Gang in rec.scuba 
wants to stick your foot in your mouth, it's still a foot in the mouth! 
===========

DING DONG still thinks the fact that he met his wife in the 1980s
in some forum NOT read by anyone in the newsgroup OR archived by
Google was relevant in the light of (2) and (3) in his bragging
that my 1992 post could have been the result of my dislike for him.

What an OBTUSE FAT HEAD you are, Lee!


>If you're going to try to turn this into a rec.scuba type message, try to
>tell the whole truth for a change.
>
>Lee

The whole story is contained above!!  I didn't bother to mention
your red-herring about where you met Janna because of its utter
IRRELEVANCE, in the light of the (1), (2), and (3) I cited.

Did you wonder why that post is STILL there, after DAYS, un-touched, 
even by your idiotic dysfunctional pals, whereas they had jumped 
on my earlier posts within minutes, on your impertinence?

Because even THEY recognized that your FAT HEAD balloon had been
irreparably punctured.

-- Bob.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2