SCUBA-SE Archives

March 2002

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reef Fish <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 05:44:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 20:19:31 +1100, Christian Gerzner
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 06:45:52 -0500, From:Reef Fish
><[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>> The last time, and the ONLY time, an Octopush Championship was
>> mentioned by anyone in the 200,000,000 posts from all the ngs archived
>> by Googles was an article in 1993 in Scuba-L.  :-)
>>
>> Christian must be sooooo lonely that he wants to show that there is
>> SOMEONE who would talk to him, even if he had to post his private
>> post to show it.  :-)))
>>
>> What a bloody bloak!  <BBG>
>
>Oh, new word. Bloak.!

I know I can count on you to point out a typo.

You know what it MEANT, didn't you?  I was actually thinking of
a BLOKE with a BLOATED ego, and out came BLOAK -- which actually
fitted you perfectly.  :-)

Hey, I used a new word "dallar" in my reply to Wayne too!  What about
your FALSE CLAIM about my misspelling of "ad hominem"?  What about
all those apologies that never came?


>YOU, Bob, decide to put your *tasteless, snide* comments to it.

And I'll keep doing it too, as long as you keep being a
HIT AND RUN Coward on this list!  (see below)
>
>Christian
>
>(Last post on this subject - as usual)

Sure.  That's always an excuse for NOT responding to someone who
takes you to task about your WRONGS, isn't it?

Are you going to respond to the clip below in the P.S., EVER?

-- Bob.


P.S.  Excerpted from a post Christian SHOULD have responded to,
instead of the present one:


>Bob, one last time,
>
>I do NOT intend to respond (ever again) when I consider your post
>irrelevant, pedantic, stupid, tiresome, the list goes on.

And you did not respond to the NUMEROUS times you accused me of
"cross-posting" when I merely made a reference to another group,
which were NOT acts of cross-posting.  It was merely YOUR ERRORS
about the meaning of cross-posting.  You accused me of my
misspelling/misuse(?) of "ad hominem", when YOU were the one who
was wrong about my usage.  What's your excuse to THESE acts of yours?


>> keep reminding him and the public what an IRRESPONSIBLE
>> poster he is by claiming publicly (a LIE) that his policy is apologize
>> whenever he was (shown) wrong, while NOT responding, clarifying, let
>> alone apologizing, when he was REPEATEDLY shown WRONG.
>
>Bob, I am absolutely TERRIFIED, positively QUAKING, SHIVERING in my
>proverbial boots. Gee, where's Mummy when I need her? :I

Non sequitur and irrelevant.  A smart arse non-response gets you nowhere.


>>  Get off your hypocritical and sanctimoneous wagon and REPLY,
>>  like a MAN, and not a HIT-AND-RUN coward!!

>I'm well and truly done with this.  No more.
>
>Christian

So you have proven, by YOUR OWN action, that you are nothing but a
HIT-AND-RUN coward.   Appealing to your Mummy won't help a bit,
Christian!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2