Yourself wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 20:44:26 +1300, J.M. Vitoux <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> >> Even Jumbo-Mumbo is mum about nuclear testing by Frogs in NZ.
> >
> >How could I talk about something that didn't happen. You are
> >really loosing it. I beg you to stop writing when you don't even
> >have the beginning of a clue. You are merely further embarrassing
> >yourself.
>
> Jean-Marc, get that burr out of your ass, pronto!
>
> You, and ONLY you now, is the PERSISTENT noise maker, name-caller,
> and dwell on that burr in your ass while everyone else is settling
> down and talk about SCUBA, and scuba related pleasantries.
>
> You are WELL BEYOND EMBARRASSING YOURSELF, Jean-Marc!
>
> I have no reason to doubt whatever Viv posts.  It's called credibility!
> You have to EARN it.  I have EVERY REASON MOT to listen to the crap
> Jean-Marc posts.  J-M has long established his LACK of Credibility.

You are the one who always claims that one should research before
posting. You even once initiated a thread on "responsible
discussants". You showed how much a responsible discussant you
were an the EPIRB thread and now this.

Here is what you wrote :

"Even Jumbo-Mumbo is mum about nuclear testing by Frogs in NZ"

I encourage you to take a map, do some research on the net, in
short get the facts. France never conducted any nuclear testing
in New Zealand.

Your credibility is going further down the drain...


>
> Strike> The fact that, as a nuclear power, France saw fit to conduct a
> Strike> series of tests on an attoll close to our part of the world
> Strike> was of no import to the decision makers in Paris.  (Their
> Strike> decision to test nuclear weapons in the South Pacific was,
> Strike> in fact, suggested as a cause of my own thyroid cancer!)
>
> That was sad news to me too.  Strike should know how I feel about what
> happened to him that is beyond what mere words can convey.
>
> Why AREN'T YOU saying the same to Strike?  Over the SAME nuclear
> testing Viv talked about, and I said I have no reason to doubt?

I think I made myself pretty clear as to how I felt. Your attempt
to use Stike's illness as tool to make a point is contemptible.

>
> JM> How could I talk about something that didn't happen. You are
> JM> really loosing it. I beg you to stop writing when you don't even
> JM> have the beginning of a clue.
>
> And for someone who claims such expertise in the use of the English
> language, in your pathetic and pedantic NOISE about the word "recruit",
> you're not "loosing" it.  You had been "losing" it, and you had long
> LOST IT!

Come back when you have checked the facts about the tests.

Jean-Marc