SCUBA-SE Archives

August 2000

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:10:21 -0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Ah, yes, now I have read the third page which I didn't see last time.  So,
it was a very slight hit, one that you could deny the symptoms for a few
days.  It figures.  I guess, you pointed out all the possible contributing
factors but at the end of the day, it was just your turn.  As Strike said,
no one can give you a hard time about it because no one is completely
immuned (unless he doesn't dive).

The ascent from 30m to 10m which I pointed out in my last mail is the only
violation that I see, from the point of view of the <rather> new theories
of deep stops.  Did you read Pyle's article about deep stops?

http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix/pile/deepstops.html

Now that you know that you can get hit, staying within your computer's
limits, you might want to revise this part of your diving.  We all know
that the only part which is responsible for hits is the ascent :-)


Regards,

                   Kuty

ATOM RSS1 RSS2