On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 07:31:34 -0500, Chuck <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Reef Fish" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:33 PM
>Subject: Re: [SCUBA-SE] Some INTERESTING statistics and an Editorial
>
>
>> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 20:33:30 -0500, Chuck <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> ><SNIP>
>> >> There is NO sweet-smelling rose, but stench from Nick Simicich's
>> >> tyranny and massacre that reeked to high heaven because Nick badly
>> >> abused his power as a LISTSERV List owner, violated the PRICIPLE
>> >> and RULES by which all known CHARTER of Scuba-L, and all
>> >> unmoderated-and-OPEN Listserv Lists operate, to have caused MOST
>> >> MOST of us who are here to leave Scuba-L in protest.
>> >>
>> >> That's the difference!
>> >>
>> >You really should have someone look at that foaming at the mouth Bob.
>> >Someone might think you were rabid.
>> >
>> >CH
>>
>> Chuck, you wouldn't understand a reasoned and calm statement of
>> OUTRAGEOUS as mine was, against Nick's abominable acts, because
>> you were the ONLY one who batted 100% for him for all his LIES
>> which have proven to be lies.
>>
>Get over it Bob. Put a period in it. Not many other than you are carrying
>this particular torch and you are making yourself out to be a fool and/or
>curmudgeon.
>
>CH

What does that make YOU?

Why are YOU the only one who has called me a fool and a curmudgen?

Is it just REMOTELY POSSIBLE that

>> you were the ONLY one who batted 100% for him for all his LIES
>> which have proven to be lies.

You've even acted as the unethical messenger of passing my PRIVATE
email to a group of Scuba-Lers to Nick, and had the GALL to flame
me more to that private group when you were pointed out your ERRORS
and anti-nettiquette and unethical acts.

This time I am saying everything PUBLICLY, and have suggested others
to SUGGEST to Nick to remove himself.   That's about as fair and
open as I can be, given what Nick did to Scuba-L.

You can, if you want to do something constructive, make the suggestion
to Nick YOURSELF.  Else, you can just forward my posts (it's okay to
do so because they are PUBLIC) to Nick, or point him to the Scuba-SE
archives to read them.

You can do all of these.

But you're the (FIRST and) LAST one I want to hear

> you are making yourself out to be a fool and/or curmudgeon.

because given your own role, you are NOT a "disinterested party"
and you have already lost all credibility regarding anything you
had to say regarding Nick!

-- Bob.