On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 01:29:14 -0400, Krazy Kiwi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 09:17:33 -0700, Reef Fish
><[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>><snip of the kiwi shears>
>>I look at what's going on in Scuba-L occasionally
>>(between my extensive travels) VIA THE WEBPAGE
>>archives ONLY (which requires NO SUBSCRIPTION
>>to Scuba-L), as I've done now to have seen the
>>thread in which several posters suggested that I
>>faked my identity in posting something to Scuba-L.
>>
>>The irresponsible acts and PERFONAL ATTACKS (Nick,
>>not this -- Quinn and others were attacking me
>>PERSONALLY by suggesting that I fake mail.

I hope everyone reads Nick's response to this!!

He said it's OK for Scuba-L subscribers to attack ME because
I was, by my own admission, not a subscriber to Scuba-L.  One
more NEW wrinkle to suit his dictatorial whim.  He has missed
his calling as a baffoon.

The kicker was the fact that I subscribed to DEFEND myself
by pointing out the OBVIOUS, that I do NOT fake posts, and I was
given the perverbial "three contrived strikes" and an accusatory
reply by Nick in Scuba-L while simultaneously banning me from
posting any reply in Scuba-L in response or rebuttal.

Is this "non-diving control freak" for REAL?   ;-)

Does he think he can fool ALL of the people ALL of the time?


>Im just catching up on wots been going down on the scuba lists. Why am I
>NOT surprised to see QUINN'S name, and other members of that certain FAN
>CLUB (truely clueless), who are just as dumb for carrying on their
>vendetta, putting the boot in!
>
>My, my .. things must be pretty boring on scuba-l if all they can do is
>blame Bob for this, blame Bob for that! Poor souls! They dont have a life!!

In fairness to the current Scuba-Lers, I suspect the MAJORITY of them
do have a life.  It's those perennial FEW that you've put your finger
where it belonged (or should I have said hit the nail on the head :-)?

< other kind and sensible words by Viv snipped >

I know I can always count on a few to see a naked emperor and CALL him
naked!

The next thing you know, Nick is going to accuse YOU of being my "puppet",
as he strongly insinuated Strike and others were.

Let me say this: as intriguing a thought it may be to imagine my hand
under your skirt to work you as a puppet (that's how some puppeteers
work ain't it?) <BWG>.   I can assure everyone that I ain't no
puppeteer and you ain't no puppet!  There is a 100% certainty!

-- Bob.