Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 5 Oct 2001 08:23:44 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:35 PM, Lee Bell wrote:
(snip)
> Russ, Strike has chosen to quote something out of context,
I have quoted nothing out of context.
>chosen to leave
> out the entire discussion that lead up to it and has violated netiquette
by
> posting private messages in public,
Neither have I posted private messages in public. I stated what I had been
told by you.
>clearly for no purpose other than to
> attack someone who was not part of the discussion.
I did it to highlight a possible reason for your goading of me. With Bob,
your stated purpose in goading him was to create a better list environment,
one in which there would be no personal attacks. (Over the years, I have
been guilty of making such attacks in response to people who 'threw the
first stone'. Occassionally I have even initiated the attack - and usually
apologised for it afterwards.) Is that why I've now become the focus of
your crusading attention?
> He has violated his own
> stated standards of dislike for double standards by doing so.
Have I?
> I chose not to enter into a battle with you or anyone else because of his
> misrepresentations.
What misrepresentations?
>I suggest you review his posts and mine over the last
> few months and determine for yourself who is and who is not the enemy of
> whom.
As (if?) you mature, you'll come to realise that people can't be measured in
terms of black-and-white. Despite my protestations that I am my own person,
one who is quite capable of making his own judgements on a case-by-case
basis in a discussion, you have cast me as your 'enemy' because I refused to
side with you against Bob.
Just so that it's clearly stated for future reference by you:
I do not regard anyone on this or any other forum or list as my enemy. On
the other hand, I do regard most of them as either friends or - at the very
least - people who demand respect. Even when their views differ from my
own. Unless they lose the right to that respect!
I am not in your 'gang'; Bob's 'gang'; or anyone elses 'gang'!
If you, Lee, find difficulty in accepting that fact then the problem is
yours - not mine! But don't continue to act as the playground bully
loooking for fresh targets to bolster your fragile ego.
Strike
|
|
|