On Thu, 8 Mar 2001 01:46:26 -0500, Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Kenneth Smith wrote:
>
>> >Would you two 10 year olds mind taking your issue off line-


>I'm not a lot better, but I like to think that my motives are.  I'm
>reacting to Bob's abuse of others and what I perceive as blatant
>violation of the standards he has often stated for others.

Such as your violation of calling me a LIAR, but steadfastly
being unable to produce any evidence of your FALSE allegation?
As in failing to look up posts in the archives (after repeated
promises to do so) but continue to call me a liar?  Such as:

RF > That's a DAMNED LIE.   I didn't say it.  You should have cited the
RF > sources.

Lee> I'll go back and confirm this one.  I'm pretty sure you did say it in
Lee> reference to Kelly's promise to find out.

Strike> I do think that it was Kelly who said that! :-)

A day later,

Lee> I have not yet had a chance to check.  If
Lee> I'm wrong, I'll admit it.

Now is THREE days later.  I am still waiting for you to check it
out, Lee.  What did you find?


Lee now says,

Lee>  I'm not a lot better, but I like to think that my motives are.

Of course you LIKE to think that.  But what is your motive in
LYING, failing to check the facts, and CONTINUE to repeat the
same lie that you cannot substantiated, when the evidence AGAINST
you lies can EASILY be retrieved from the archives?

-- Bob.