At 11/07/03 16:30 -0500, CH wrote:
>It is not a 'fake' address. Misleading perhaps, but not fake.
Maybe. Anyway it's a blatant troll that carries the name of one of the
participants in the list with a small change, and uses this account to
attack. It's a perfect example of a non "netical" use of the freedom the
on the Internet .
I vote for blocking.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Michael Doelle" <[log in to unmask]>
>
> >On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:35:48 -0700, Robert Lung <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:<
>
>Anyone want to vote for blocking posters from fake addresses?
>
>Here is one vote.
Regards,
Kuty