Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 30 May 2001 10:19:36 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 29 May 2001 10:55:23 +0100, Andy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
wrote, in reply to Christian Gerzner:
Regarding the THICKNESS of the wetsuit at 33 fsw:
CG >indeed your wetsuit is (amost) half its surface
CG >thickness at that depth
>Correct, except for the fact that it is totally wrong.
And INCORRECT! :-)
RF > Nevermind the rest of your assertions that are equally baseless.
Andy, glad to see someone (you) elaborate on the rest, about how
Christian was TOTALLY wrong in all his assertions, and had the gall
to pick on Dave DeBarger and flame me for correcting only one of
his major errors.
CG> So, you have adjudged that _everything_ I said in that post is
CG> baseless. I suspect that there might be a few around here who just
CG> possibly could disagree with you there.
Correct! :-) There MIGHT be a few "who just possibly could disagree
with you here". Did I miss somebody?
Was Andy the one? <:-)
Christian's PC must have broken down, again. I wonder why he hadn't
replied to Andy. ;-)
-- Bob.
|
|
|