On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 06:46:50 +1100, David Strike <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>On Friday, March 09, 2001 12:03 AM, Lee Bell wrote:
>
>(snip)

Lee>> The real question is whether you are the man you think you
Lee>> are and that's a question only you can ask or answer.
>
Strike> Like Popeye says, "I yam what I yam, and that's all that
Strike> I yam."  :-)

Sorry for intruding, Strike, but you forgot to say, "Boop, boop!" :-)



Strike>> > And you have admitted to purposely baiting Bob . . .
>
Lee>> Correct.  I baited him and admitted it.  I baited him more than
Lee>> once.

And whined and cried about it everytime I chose to respond to
his falsehood and lies (which he uses as his main bait) and asked
him to substantiate his lies.



Lee>>  He had no basis for his statement and, as I have previously
Lee>>  revealed, I did, in fact, know at the time.
>
Strike>  Oh, really??????

Strike>  So you didn't know for certain until last week-end.

Strike>  But how could you know that Bob didn't know what he was
Strike>  talking about if you only received confirmation of exactly
Strike>  what the device was last weekend?

Jolly good, Strike!  You missed your calling as a Shark!  :-)



>(snip)
Strike>> > My concern in this matter is that in purposely setting out to
Strike>> > bait Bob, you're creating the same environment that preceded
Strike>> > the break up of Scuba-L - a forum filled with people and
Strike>> > topics that appealed to me.
>
Lee >> Criticism accepted.

It's my turn to say, "Oh Really ??????"

Lee>> I first became involved in response to comments Bob made in
Lee>> made in public.  Since then, I have baited him, something that
Lee>> is remarkably easy to do.

That's no trade secret on YOUR part, Lee.  Ron Lee knew it.  Lots
of Aldora IDIOTS knew it.  So are you proud to emulate one of them?

I know a bait when I see it.  What I detest are GNATS like you and
Ron Lee who baited and then WHINED about my response.



Lee>> He's very predictable, another characteristic he tends to
Lee>> assign to others.

Finally a CORRECT statement.  I am predictably CONSISTENT in
my approach to FACTS and LIES and public attacks by baiters.

Lee is very predictable in setting LIES as baits and then WHINE
about it when he is called to task to substantiate it.


Strike>  Did you expect him to stop being himself and act in any
Strike>  way other than the way that he always has?
Strike>  (Particularly if acting in any other way is because
Strike>  >one or two control freaks say that he should!)

Lee is BEYOND a 'control freak".  I've done many net battles
against Nick.  Nick was a saint compared to Lee in terms of
not setting bait and then whine.

The Jewish word "Chutzpah" (sp) (which does NOT have an
English-word equivalent describes Lee's behavior perfectly.
As explained by my former colleague at Harvard, Alan Dershewitz,
by giving an example, "it's chutzpah when a child kills his
parents and then pleads to the court for leniency because he
is now an orphan."

The closest English expression I can think of to that is
"unadulterated gall".


>(snip)
>
Strike>> > As for someone stooping to a new low by
Strike>> > pretending to be me?  Well!  They'd need an awful lot
Strike>> > of mining equipment to get lower than me!  :-)
>
Lee>> Stop into Rec.Scuba again to see how wrong you are.

NOW I knew why Lee was called a "gentleman" by a few THERE.



Lee>> When Deja.Com went down, about half the list, all fakes,
Lee>> disappeared.  I would not expect to find that here, but
Lee>> there's no doubt that it's going on someplaces.
>
Strike> And your point?

That you don't have to look far to find the LOWEST form of behavior
by anyone.  Just watch Lee HERE?    ;-)

-- Bob.