Michael Doelle wrote:

Yes Lee, good boy, you remember Adolf Nazi. I knew you would. And that
excuses your former  support of Saddam exactly how?

Sorry, Michael, but you reap what you sow.  You were quick to criticize my
country's leaders for not doing what you thought they should.  You don't get
to sweep the actions of your country under the carpet in the process.  Your
country is responsible for the largest state supported campaign of genocide
in the history of the world.  Your country's leaders were the subject of
more war crime trials than the leaders of any other country that has ever
existed.  Hitler was your country's leader, and, and, like it or not, it was
your country that let him kill millions of your own citizens and your
country that let him lead you into a war of agression that makes anything
before or since look like a schoolyard brawl.  It was my country that helped
put a stop to him.  You brought up Bush, you brought up Reagan, I brought up
Hitler.  Don't blame me for the fact that your country's former leader set
the standard for evil.

> My 'country" still believes that wars of aggression should be illegal.
> Your's believes that it is OK if it suits ya.

Your country believes that wars of aggression should be illegal only since
the last time your country got it's ass kicked waging one.  My country, to
the best of my knowledge, has voluntarily turned the government of every
country we've ever fought, back to the people of the country itself.  That
includes the country you live in.  Perhaps you'd prefer the government your
had to the one you have?

> And you use Adolf to take a pot shot at me?

Pot shot at you?  Nah.  I'm not taking any shots at you at all.  I'm taking
them at your country.  Neither you, nor I was alive when Adolf was active.
His actions were not your fault or mine.  I do, however, find it funny that
someone from what has, historically been one of the most aggressive
countries in the world, should be so quick to claim to be non aggressive.  I
find it funny that someone from a country that was divided because of the
way they waged their wars (note the plural) of aggression, would be so
critical of the country that was, after all, their enemy in that war.  I
find it funny that somebody's whose country
was reunified, not by their own actions, but rather, by action of the very
same countries they so viciously attacked a few decades before, would
complain about not getting enough support for that reunification.

BTW, has your country's oh so honest press announced the fact that missiles
that Saadam denied having have already been used by Iraq?  How long do you
suppose it will be before the chemical and biological weapons he swore he
didn't have show up?