On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:18:07 -0400, Krazy Kiwi Viv <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

DarLING Viv, you've been w**king TOOOOOOOO hard, which was why you
had uncharacteristically misattributed some of the quotes below. :-)
I guess those ">>>>>>>>>>>>>" made it hard to count too ...

>On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:06:57 -0400, Reef Fish wrote:
>
>Lee wrote:

No.  Mika wrote that to Kuty:

>>>>>> Of course, there are things men place too much emphasis on as
>>>>>> well, but that's a different topic, one that even real men
>>>>>> rarely feel comfortable discussing.
>
>Mika replied with:

No, Mika continued to Kuty.  :-)

>>>> No wonder it was so easy to covert you to the 7ft hose. And I'll
>>>> talk to you about it next weekend, if it makes you feel better.


>Carl, a million miles away doing lotsa other things that required his full
>attention :-) posted:

No no.  Carl hasn't come into the script yet.  :^).  LEE wrote this:

>>>> Mine's only 6 feet, but so far, it's gotten the job done for me.
><big snip>

NOW the worst part is ... you snipped what Carl wrote ... because
he came in with his 5 ft hose, in serious DIR talk.  He done
confessed and explained he got a good laugh AFTERWARDS.
>
>And Da Feesh queried:
>>Do I have an overly-active HUMOR gland (I thought the above was
>>VERY funny), or does Carl's sense of humor need a tune up? ;)
>
>My mind was in over-drive ;-) My workmates wondered why I had such a wicked
>grin on my face. V

NOW you can laugh.

BTW, this is yet another reason to read a thread in a THREADED form
in the web archives.   It makes attribution MUCH easier WITHOUT all
those excessive ">".

At any rate.  Everyone got the joke.  It didn't matter who said
what to whom.  My Humor Quotient remain intact when I questioned
Carl's DIR analysis.  And we all live happily hereafter watching
boobs.  :)

-- Bob.