On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:07:13 -0600, Mike <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On 20 Mar 2001, at 21:56, Reef Fish wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:01:51 -0600, Mike <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> > On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:09 PM, Poe Lim wrote:
>>
>> >> > > although you could not do a reverse profile of more than 3m (from
>> memory).
>>
>>
>> >Inverted is how I have always known it Jean..... in other words
>> >doing a shallow dive first then a deeper one.....
>> >
>> >Mike
>>
>> There appeared to be TWO different terms.  What Po Lim stated was
>> CLEARLY relative to REPETITIVE dives ONLY (as is the way computers
>> are often programmed to check) whether the max depth of the present
>> dive is greater than the max depth of the preceding dive -- if so,
>> it's called "reverse".
>>
>> The reason the repetitive context is clear is because there is NO
>> WAY a dive operator could possibly know what Poe Lim did DURING
>> a dive.  :-)
>
>Unless of course they were diving with Poe...

There is no implication of that in Poe's statement.  In fact, you
correctly interpreted his statement to mean "repetitive dives".

A better NIT would have been, "They could have downloaded Poe's
detailed profile (if he carried a divecomp that saves such or if
Poe used a HyperAqualand watch) for the ONE dive in question.

Again, there is no implication of such in Poe's statement.

-- Bob.