On Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:18 AM, Huw wrote:
(Snip)
> The gloomy light levels, green rather than blue water, mean she is
> encrusted rather than coraled, and give the whole dive the atmosphere of
an
> immaculate UK wreck with the water warmed up, and simply smothered in
> astounding qualtities of tropical life. We were constantly parting thick
> curtains of baitfish, and the shape of the wreck shimmered and pulsed as
> the schools swirled around.
Mate! That's sheer poetry - I love it! :-)
(snip)
> Being cautious, we had planned two minutes @ 24m, followed by 1@18, 1@12,
> 2@9 and [log in to unmask] What I hadn't allowed for was how fast the stinger would
> *clock up* deco during the deep stops... the worst case was on the way up
> from 18 to 12, where it briefly showed a rather heart sinking 19 minutes
to
> surface!
Now I just have to ask: Why that particular regimen? (The reason that I ask
is, it seems to me, that the depth increments chosen by you are up the shit
bonza!) :-)))))))
> We completed the ascent as per the original plan, and after 5 mins at 6m
it
> was still showing 11 mins to surface. I still had 60 BAR, ample to sit at
> 3m and let the pooter clear (the computer between the ears was sure I was
> clear at this point - and besides, my buddy's computer, as well as other
> people who had done considerably more aggressive profiles than us were all
> also clear) - but coffee and cake were calling, so I tied it to the drop
> line to clear without me and went up. Don't try this at home kids! And I
> felt great on the boat, so I must have got it right.
I don't doubt, for one minute, that you got it right. But what was the
basis for doing it? :-)
Strike
|