SCUBA-SE Archives

September 2003

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Doelle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SCUBA or ELSE! Diver's forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:23:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Lee said:

>"say, 30 minutes" is kind of vague.  I don't know what's important about
it,
one way or the other.<

Nothing. Completely arbitrary. But I've done that on computers and the deco
times where somewhat reasonable. And it can be done on one gas without
getting into really deep shit.

>  I think it's probably more accurate to say that the
decompression procedures followed by the WKPP are somewhat unique and are
inconsistent with algorithms available even on trimix computers.<

Well, forget t-mix computers then. How many units has Chris Parret sold
anyway.

>I've been diving with more than one WKPP member over the years.  No matter
what others say, some of them were using computers, as computers and that's
all I've ever claimed.<

Since when is this news? JJ used to teach using a Bridge.

>> You have to show up with dbl tanks and bungee wings first.
>> And bungee the LH. And, and, and. Hey, it ain't all that easy being a
>> stroke, either. You gotta make a conscious effort first.

>It's a shame not everybody agrees with you.  There would have been a lot
fewer arguments and a lot less hard feelings over the years if they did.<

I don't follow rec.scuba. But go ahead and show me posts where George was
calling rec divers strokes somewhere. 

M

ATOM RSS1 RSS2