Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:10:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Reef Fish wrote:
> Rule 17 calls for an AMENDMENT!
>
> >17. There are old divers and there are bold divers. There are, however,
> >no old bold divers.
> UNLESS the old, bold diver knows his LIMITS and dive WITHIN them!! :-)))
> I offer da Feeesh as a very OLD specimen for the amendment. 8-0>
No amendment required. By definition, a diver who knows his limits and
dives within them is not a "bold diver". He's just a diver. Of course,
that's only my definition, but I'm sticking to it.
Welcome back.
> Happy Anniversary -- Coz99NEDfesters! :-)
Thanks. Happy Anniversary to you too. With so much that has happened in
the last year, somehow it seems like more than a year. Guess I should be
content with at least seeming to grow older slowly.
Lee
|
|
|