SCUBA-SE Archives

June 2000

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:10:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Reef Fish wrote:

> Rule 17 calls for an AMENDMENT!
>
> >17.  There are old divers and there are bold divers.  There are, however,
> >no old bold divers.

> UNLESS the old, bold diver knows his LIMITS and dive WITHIN them!!  :-)))
> I offer da Feeesh as a very OLD specimen for the amendment.  8-0>

No amendment required.  By definition, a diver who knows his limits and
dives within them is not a "bold diver".  He's just a diver.  Of course,
that's only my definition, but I'm sticking to it.

Welcome back.

> Happy Anniversary -- Coz99NEDfesters!   :-)

Thanks.  Happy Anniversary to you too.  With so much that has happened in
the last year, somehow it seems like more than a year.  Guess I should be
content with at least seeming to grow older slowly.

Lee

ATOM RSS1 RSS2