Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2000 08:37:56 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:07:15 +1000
David Strike <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi, Wayne! I read Mike's follow-up post with the newspaper report, but it
> was still short on detail. It'd be interesting to know if the dive
> operation pumped gas other than compressed air? If you wouldn't mind
> posting them as they come to hand, I'd certainly be interested in any follow
> up accounts of what actually ocurred.
> Also - and as an aside - what are the cylinder testing requirements in
> Canada in terms of a VIP as opposed to hydrostatic tests?
Requirements? We are still self regulating here. :-)
The standard industry guideline is followed....Yearly visual with 5yr
hydro.
I am noticing that some dive stores [the progressive one's] are
requiring Visual + stickers before they will fill.
They will not accept the old look with light and mirrors standard for
good reason IMO.
I have seen examples of tanks that passed one shop's visual and then
fail the Visual + NDT check test which were subsequently replaced by
the manufacturer as being faulty.
Michael
--
Divers know the true meaning of peace of mind.
|
|
|