SCUBA-SE Archives

April 2001

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 23:21:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Mike wrote:

> The last few recommendations that I seen from the DIR camp on
> open water rigs have been with 40" hoses on both primary and
> secondary rather than the 5' hose. I prefer the 5' myself as does my
> son.

That would certainly be a switch.  While the primary hose length has varied
over the years, the short alternate, much shorther than 40", necklaced, has
been pretty standard.  I haven't seen anything like this from the DIR
advocates I still post with occasionally.  Where did you see it?

Lee

ATOM RSS1 RSS2