You're correct, your post came in while I was
composing mine. That's a drawback of a webmail
interface.

Ironically enough, by now the volume of posts on this
subject exceeds the ratio of spam by at least 100:1,
and certainly I'm sorry I started the whole thing! :-)

(Of course my original question was couldn't we just
ban our friend "hahaha", and I'm still not sure if
that is possible or not with listserv.)

However, I am getting an education in listserv and
that's not bad.

Thanks
David H.

--- Reef Fish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> You probably hadn't seen my post about the LISTSERV
> definition of "private" vs "public".  The result of
> your (and others' votes for "private"), in the
> manner
> it's implemented by AUTOMATIC LISTSERV SOFTWARE,
> will
> make Scuba-SE just as PUBLIC as ever, under the
> definitions of "private/public" in LISTSERV LISTS.
>
> It's like saying "I vote to ACQUIT the defendant;  I
> don't see any good argument against why the
> defendant
> shouldn't be voted GUILTY."  :-)
>
> Is that an oxymoron or what?
>
> -- Bob.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/