On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:33:43 +1100, Christian Gerzner 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 11:57:07 -0500, +?windows-1252?Q?Reef_Fish?=
><[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>Huge amounts of total, obtuse drivel, 99.9% of which, if it could be
>understood by anyone at all, would have absolutely no relevance to
>anyone but himself and/or, possibly, Lee Bell. All it does for anyone
>else is make them go glassy eyed.

In your glassy eyed state of stupor, you seem to have overlooked
the fact that I was responding to David Strike!  

You are welcome to address any of the SUBSTANCE of what I posted.
You have nothing of substance to discuss, and as you confessed,
in your paragraph above, you missed all the POINTS!


>Incidentally, whilst I don't necessarily agree with Lee's arguments (I
>couldn't be bothered to try to sort the wheat from the chaff in all that
>muckraking) when I'm in the tropical Pacific I, too, don't use any kind
>of BCD and I seem to manage to survive. 

You also missed the point of NEUTRAL BUOYANCY, and the fact that
it had NOTHING to do with whether one wears any BCD or not.  It
has to do with the IMPOSSIBILITY of compensating 6 lbs of weight
DIFFERENTIAL via changing the breathing pattern alone.

Of course you couldn't be bothered to sort the wheat from the chaff.
Then you should just STFU!


>INCOMING!!! What tender morsels are you going to dredge up about me this
>time Bob?
>
>Christian

Nothing.  You own stupidity and your inability to read for
comprehension had been proven by yourself.

-- Bob.