SCUBA-SE Archives

July 2000

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: A DRY dive in the Chatanooga Aquarium
From:
Reef Fish <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 21:06:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:12:58 -0500, Mike Wallace <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>From: "Reef Fish" <[log in to unmask]>

>> British Columbia diving may be GOOD;  it may be VERY GOOD;  and it
>> may even be ONE of the BEST.  But to say that British Columbia is
>> THE BEST (that's numero uno;  one and only BEST) dive destination
>> in North America, and you don't find anything unusual about it?
>
>I would find it unusual. There is no BEST. My BEST most certainly would not
>be your BEST or Mika's BEST or possibly even anyone else's BEST.

Certainly true.  But that was supposed to be the CONCENSUS "Best"
among the entire readership of Rodale's, and SUPPOSEDLY a reflection
of the opinion of all divers in North America about North America.
THAT's what made the result so ridiculous.

-- Bob.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2