SCUBA-SE Archives

January 2002

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bjorn Vang Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:44:37 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Steven wrote:

> > > - And why is 50% oxygen more conservative ?
> In terms of oxygen exposure, wouldn't using the highest 02 setting be the
> most
> conservative ?

I guess so, but IMO this is not the major danger of the two possibles.
Pretending that you are diving on 50% oxygen would make the algorithm assume
that you are much "safer" than you really are in terms of nitrogen loading.

Bjorn

ATOM RSS1 RSS2