David Strike wrote:

> (snipping and taking stuff out of context 'cause I'm pissed off with yet
> another diving publication that's used my stuff without permission - and
who
> refuses to pay on the grounds that it'll cost me more in lawyers fees
trying
> to recover the debt than is owed!!!)

Name the company so disrespectful and larcenous and we'll gladly take over
from there.  Which do you suppose would be less costly, paying for what they
stole or the loss of business that might be the result of their larceny?

Lee