SCUBA-SE Archives

February 2006

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reef Fish <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SCUBA or ELSE! Diver's forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:14:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:09:56 -0500, Lee Bell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>"Michael Doelle" wrote:
>
>Bob said:
>
>[much snippage]
>
>>You compensate for 6 or so lbs in buoyancy change by
>>shifting your breathing pattern???? That would require
>>constant, close to 3 liters exhale at the end of your
>>dive ;-))  What is the tidal volume of your lungs -
>>15 liters?:-))) <
>
>MD>That exchange would have qualified as one of the all-time techdiver
>MD>classics. Except that it happend at a time that the techdiver list was
>MD>already in decline.
>
>It would except for the fact that Bob's putting words in my mouth again. 

Lee should have noticed that the QUOTE was what someone in TECHDIVER
said to Lee -- about Lee's claim that he could compensate 6 lb shift
[shift in weight of air in the tank from full to empty] during a dive.
I was not in that conversation at all!

 He
>recently tried the same thing in rec.scuba and got his hat handed to 
him . .
>. again.  I have claimed, and continue to claim to be able to adjust by
>about 2 lbs plus or minus by altering breathing patterns.  That's all it
>takes for the average consumption in an 80 cubic foot tank, which is what
>was being discussed at the time.  I did it for the 29 years I dove without 
a
>BC of any kind and I've done it for the 15 years since.  

What Lee did in rec.scuba, after he was shown the physics by Hugh
Huntzinger, back himself all the way down from 6 lbs to 2 lbs, while
admitting, as Hugh correctly suggested to him, that he was a bit
heavy at the beginning of a dive, and a bit light at the end, and
as long as he is MOVING, anyone can handle that kind of difference.

But the discussion was about NEUTRAL BUOYANCY -- which means not
positive nor negative while NOT in motion.

Trouble with Lee, among his ignorance in physics, physiology, and
other diving matters, is his poor MEMORY of what was being discussed
and who said what to whom.


Just want to set this record straight that Lee shot his own foot
again.   The quote above about the 6 lb shift was NOT something 
I put in his mouth.   If was in a discussion in TECHDIVER in which
everyone was amazed at how ignorant could be, about physiology and
the physics of buoyancy.

-- Bob.

At the Bahia in Cozumel.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2