OPENMPE Archives

October 2002

OPENMPE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:01:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On 1 Oct 2002 at 13:35, [log in to unmask] wrote:

> In complete disagreement with Mark's assessment, I would back all of
> the POSIX stuff out of MPE. POSIX really is not much more than a poor
> imitation of UNIX. Given that Linux is freely available, it doesn't
> even belong on MPE. It is nothing other than an unnecessary and
> generally unuseful complexification of MPE.

More water under the bridge. Without it, MPE would've died in the mid
90's. As far as pulling it out - it is too tightly integrated with
the kernel today as to make that darn near impossible.

> But that market exists only if MPE is simplified and
> made even more understandable to the average human than it is now.

Well, I suppose there's still MPE/V.

> Indeed, I
> suspect that it would become the dominant operating system for every
> small and medium commercial use other than web servers and embedded
> systems.

How would you propose going head to head with Windows, because that's
the market you're describing?
--
Mark Klein
http://www.dis.com
PGP Key Available

ATOM RSS1 RSS2