OPENMPE Archives

December 2002

OPENMPE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:36:25 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On 6 Dec 2002 at 10:13, Chuck Ryan wrote:

> Then it is an exercise in futility.
>
> The fee will not be determined by what we consider reasonable, but by
> what these vendors will accept as a licensing fee.

I'm not so sure. Let me speak for a moment as a former vendor myself.

While it is true that license fees can be a fixed amount per license,
in the case where tiered pricing exists, basing fees on a percentage
basis yields more income at the higher tiers.

So, let's assume for a moment that the licensing of this stuff is a
percentage. I don't know that's the case, if someone from HP wants to
confirm or deny it (assuming they can), please do so. If it is a
percentage, then this exercise is not futile. It will help identify a
price point that we can strive to achieve.

My opinions only.


--
Mark Klein
http://www.dis.com
PGP Key Available

ATOM RSS1 RSS2