I have to agree with Chuck.  With all the discussion about being under the
NDA with HP, then refusing to release the vote count (which won't change who
was elected) seems like more attempts at hiding something from the members
of OpenMPE.

Isn't that the impression that the new board will try to AVOID?   Refusal to
share the voting numbers only fosters the feelings of being kept in the
dark.

Whether or not there is a precedence in sharing the vote, maybe this can set
new precedence of OPENESS with the "Open"MPE group?

Chuck Ciesinski wrote:

> Steve,
>
> I sincerely hope it that it will be a discussion point.  I truly believe
> that the Board needs
> to keep every aspect of OpenMPE visible so that we, the HP customers can
> make good decisions for our employers with our economic power.  Openness
> is
> preferred over NDA's and such.
>
> My $.04 for inflation,
>
> Chuck Ciesinski
> Hughes Network Systems
> 11717 Exploration Lane
> Germantown, MD  20876
> p  301 601 2608
> f   301 601 6303
> email  [log in to unmask]
> "The joy of life is living it..."  unknown

--
Jim Alexander   Longs Drug Stores
Sr. Systems Programmer  925-210-6901
The opinions expressed are Mine and not Longs Drugs