OPENMPE Archives

April 2004

OPENMPE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Martin Vaughn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Martin Vaughn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:09:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
Amen!

Martin Vaughn
Demand Wave Solutions
1015 South Wall Street
Suite G
Calhoun, GA 30701
USA
[log in to unmask]
706-625-4898 extension 12
fax: 706-625-4473

'Et semel emissum, volat irrevocabile verbum' - Horace 65 BC - 8 BC.
(Once sent out, a word takes wing and cannot be re-called) [Epistles I.
xviii 71]
__________________
The contents of this message represent the opinions of the employee and
not
necessarily the opinions of Demand Wave Solutions.




-----Original Message-----
From: OpenMPE Support Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Schwartzman, Zelik
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:21 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OpenMPE Elections Results


To all OPENMPEers
Just to add my 2 cents worth.  I think you all are focusing on the elections
numbers too much.  We should really be discussing the issues at hand with
HP.  Isn't that what we are charged to do??  Lets get down to business and
move on already.
Zelik

-----Original Message-----
From: OpenMPE Support Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim
Alexander
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 11:46 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OpenMPE Elections Results

I have to agree with Chuck.  With all the discussion about being under the
NDA with HP, then refusing to release the vote count (which won't change who
was elected) seems like more attempts at hiding something from the members
of OpenMPE.

Isn't that the impression that the new board will try to AVOID?   Refusal to
share the voting numbers only fosters the feelings of being kept in the
dark.

Whether or not there is a precedence in sharing the vote, maybe this can set
new precedence of OPENESS with the "Open"MPE group?

Chuck Ciesinski wrote:

> Steve,
>
> I sincerely hope it that it will be a discussion point.  I truly believe
> that the Board needs
> to keep every aspect of OpenMPE visible so that we, the HP customers can
> make good decisions for our employers with our economic power.  Openness
> is
> preferred over NDA's and such.
>
> My $.04 for inflation,
>
> Chuck Ciesinski
> Hughes Network Systems
> 11717 Exploration Lane
> Germantown, MD  20876
> p  301 601 2608
> f   301 601 6303
> email  [log in to unmask]
> "The joy of life is living it..."  unknown

--
Jim Alexander   Longs Drug Stores
Sr. Systems Programmer  925-210-6901
The opinions expressed are Mine and not Longs Drugs

ATOM RSS1 RSS2