OPENMPE Archives

April 2004

OPENMPE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen A Suraci <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:29:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (55 lines)
Chuck,

I don't think Chad ran in this election!

My point on president was regarding OpneMPE votes.  No vote in an OpenMPE
election has ever been made public to the best of my knowledge.

I have no concerns either way.  Based on all the feedback, I am inclined to
believe this will be a point of discussion in our weekly conference call.

Regards,
-Steve
_____________________________________
Stephen A. Suraci
Pivital Solutions, Inc.
Phone:  (603) 382-3345
Fax:    (603) 382-6354
E-mail: [log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: OpenMPE Support Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Ciesinski
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OpenMPE Elections Results


Steve,

I humbly beg to disagree about there not being any precedent on releasing
vote
counts.  As a past candidate for the Interex Board of Directors, the vote
counts for
those elections have always been made available and published by Interex.
Which
sets the precedent.

I see absolutely no reason why the membership of OpenMPE should not be
given
the ballot counts.  Afterall, there should be nothing to hide since there
was an outside
auditor of the ballots to insure no 'hanging chads'.

My $ .04 for inflation,

Chuck Ciesinski
Hughes Network Systems
11717 Exploration Lane
Germantown, MD  20876
p  301 601 2608
f   301 601 6303
email  [log in to unmask]
"The joy of life is living it..."  unknown

ATOM RSS1 RSS2