Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:39:54 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 1 Oct 2002 at 14:17, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Show me a system that hasn't been re-booted in the last two years, and
> I'll bet it says HP3000 on it.
Prior to moving out of the San Rafael office in January, I could've
shown you a FreeBSD box on an x486 (yes, that's not a typo) that was
up for well over a year. That box was the primary DNS and sendmail
servers for the company.
Yes, the HPe3000 can stay up a long time. My point is that other
platforms can as well and that no longer gives the 3000 its sole
advantage.
> If HP would commit to
> opening MPE, they'd sell even more, (here, in fact), because people
> would see a future in MPE. They are shooting themselves in the foot.
> MPE would grow if truly open, without HP's "help".
And what you're saying is the that what we saw and heard last week
was not progress towards opening up MPE? Or are you talking about
Open Source MPE? That is an entirely different subject.
--
Mark Klein
http://www.dis.com
PGP Key Available
|
|
|