OPENMPE Archives

October 2002

OPENMPE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Santucci <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Santucci <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:32:09 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Jonathan M. Backus wrote:

>         If I'm not mistaken Wirt is the only software vendor (utility
> or application) that has responded to the issue of HPCPUNAME and
> HPSUSAN and he's making moves that eliminate his concerns.  Does this
> mean that none of the other vendors care about the presence of these
> variables or not? Perhaps the emulator vendor(s) don't even need to
> care about this aspect then.

I wouldn't bet on it. Try cross-posting the question to HP3000-L or
SigSoftVend and you'll likely see more reaction from vendors. My guess is
HPSUSAN going to be important if only from the standpoint of preventing
piracy, even if they should somehow all agree not to use tier-based pricing
ala HPCPUNAME. But I think it's probably way too early for most to know that
what pricing strategy they may use.

Patrick
(I'm not a vendor, and I don't play one on TV.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick Santucci
HP e3000 Systems Administrator
Computer Operations Team Lead
Cornerstone Brands, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2