Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:03:44 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Roy,
No, only 5% (roughly) had a problem. Basicly 95% were saying the HP
hardware requirement was a non-issue. HP hardware could be any platform from
HP (and/or former Compaq), including Intel based boxes.
Thanx,
Jon
Quoting Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>:
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: "Jon Backus" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:20 PM
> Subject: [OPENMPE] PA-RISC Emulator
>
> > Currently there are two potential companies interested in the
> > creation of a PA-RISC emulator, Allegro and SRI. I believe both
> > companies are on the list and can speak for themselves. I personally
> > found the HP news on this topic to be positive progress. Naturally
> > the details will determine just how positive. One requirement HP is
> > placing on the licensing of MPE on an emulatored PA-RISC environment
> > is that it must be on HP hardware. A quick poll of the room on how
> > many people were interested in an emulator showed roughly 90% - 95%
> > were interested. Then asked how many would not be interested if they
> > had to run it on HP hardware less then 5% lowered their hands.
>
>
> The way I read that last sentence, less than 5% of the people in the room
> showed that they *would* be interested in an HP-hardware-only emulator.
> Is that what you meant?
>
> But what's HP hardware? Does HP-supplied Intel count? Indeed, will there
> *be*
> anything else?
>
> --
> Roy Brown
>
> Posting with the OEnemy, tamed by OE-QuoteFix 1.17.6
> http://jump.to/oe-quotefix
>
|
|
|