Yosef after Wirt:
> This brings up another very important "marketing" issue. The emulated
> product cannot afford to be seen as an "MPE retread."

I'm personally not planning on marketing an emulator to people who don't
know what an HP 3000 is.  If anyone feels that this is a viable market or
would like to bundle the emulator and MPE as a part of their solution
(visible or invisible) I'd be happy to talk about branding, repackaging,
sublicensing, distribution agreements, or whatever.

You could call it .MPE (dot MPE) to compete with .NET or something.

G.