> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan M. Backus [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:18 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: MPE Licensing (Thanks to Jeff Vance)
>
>
> Chuck,
>
>         Because of a Non-disclosure agreement, I was not
> permitted to be more
> specific then that.  The fact that HP decided to be more
> specific later was
> their choice, right, and was greatly appreciated.  I refer to
> Tom's earlier
> reply on all other points.
>
> Thanx,
>         Jon
>

Ah, my mistake, I thought OpenMPE was independent of HP.

It is very interesting that you were willing to make a post that
misrepresented the purpose of your discussion. It appears that instead of
asking for suggestions you were actually testing the waters for HP about
their proposed price. I personally would have found this to be ethically
questionable, but that is just me.

Comments are my own, not my employer's... etc.





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic message is legally privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee.  If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or any
attachment is strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error,
please notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be
corrected and delete it immediately.