OPENMPE Archives

April 2004

OPENMPE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:35:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
> I'm a lot more interested in whether HP's latest message gives you
> any hope, and what you think will make a difference in deciding your
> 3000's future. Despite what you may have heard, at least a plurality
> of 3000 owners have not yet decided how to compute in 2007. Your
> organization is as forward-looking as any in the 3000 community.
> Instead of looking back at a nondisclosure arrangement that appears
> essential to HP's intellectual property negotiations, why not look
> ahead -- to what you will need from HP and OpenMPE to continue as an
> MPE user?
> 

All I saw was an attempt at buying off the board and more promises to
consider the possibility of deciding to make a decision about the date
they would be able to discuss the meeting where they might be willing to
discuss the future of MPE sometime in mid 2005.

In other words, I saw an attempted payoff and more stalling.

What I am waiting to see is the response from the board. Maybe they will
even get around to posting something before the mid 2005 date set by HP.

Comments are my own, not my employer's... etc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2