Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:59:10 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well then, something that allows continued use when HP abandons all computing platforms.
Unless the emulator can run on PA-RISC Inkjet cartridges....;)
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan M. Backus [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Mon 9/30/2002 12:57 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc:
Subject: Re: PA-RISC Emulator
Neil,
The planned requirement (as I understand it) would not stipulate
"Intel platforms", but rather HP (or Compaq) on the box. It's up to the
emulator vendors to decide what platform(s) they support, i.e. Windows,
Linux, HP-UX, etc. In theory a vendor could choose to create a PA-RISC
emulator that runs on IA-64 and then MPE/iX would be on IA-64 (albeit,
through an emulator).
Thanx,
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: OpenMPE Support Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Neil Harvey
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [OPENMPE] PA-RISC Emulator
While I disagree with this restriction, I would suggest that something will
have to built into the license agreement that allows continued use of the
emulator on hardware other than HP, when HP terminates Intel platforms.
HP has a clear history of abandoning hardware platforms.
I'd hate to find myself in the same situation I do now when HP announces EOL
on all PC/Server hardware in 2006.....
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Backus [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thu 9/26/2002 6:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc:
Subject: PA-RISC Emulator
Currently there are two potentual companies interested in the
creation of a
PA-RISC emulator, Allegro and SRI. I believe both companies are on
the list
and can speak for themselves. I personally found the HP news on
this topic to
be positive progress. Naturally the details will determine just how
positive. One requirement HP is placing on the licensing of MPE on
an
emulatored PA-RISC environment is that it must be on HP hardware. A
quick
pole of the room on how many people were interested in an emulator
showed
roughly 90% - 95% were interested. Then asked how many would not be
interested if they had to run it on HP hardware less then 5% lowered
their
hands.
Thanx,
Jon Backus
|
|
|