Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:11:32 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ken asks:
> Wirt still wishes:
>
> > Actually, if I had my way, I would back Posix completely out
> > of MPE, eliminate the hierarchical file system, and run HP-UX
> > as a subdomain of MPE.
>
> Nothing wrong with wishing...... but (just for one example):
> What would we do about IMAGE JUMBO and B-Tree files
> that are now in HFS space ??... :-)
It's not that much of problem yet. My complaints are to keep it from becoming
much worse.
Jumbo datasets are going to go away on their own as soon as a flat 64-bit file
space is put into MPE. Because Jumbos were never represented as anything more
than a spit-and-bubblegum patch and were never meant to be a permanent
structure, the use of HFS files never bothered me all that much.
However, putting the b-tree files into the HFS filespace was the one great
thing I regretted about the way b-trees were implemented. That's a lot more
likely to be seen as permanent structure (although it shouldn't be; this stuff
is still called SOFTware). Nonetheless, I want to know: "Who's idea was it to
use HFS file extensions anyway?"
Wirt "who knows the answer and just wants to rub salt in a wound" Atmar
|
|
|