HP3000-L Archives

August 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Aug 1999 11:43:38 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Judy writes:

> I have received 26 responses representing 30 votes to date.  The results so
> far are 1 YES and 29 NO.

Ahh...one person who either couldn't read, or couldn't work out the
implications of what they read.  The only other conspiracy-free
alternative is to assume that they don't care about the electoral
process ... because they voted for a known faulty bylaw, hoping
that it would be corrected later.  If a law is faulty, it's your duty to
vote against it ... and perhaps help to get a non-faulty one on the ballot.
(The conspiracy theory is that the "yes" voter was fully aware of the
flaw, and hoped to benefit from it somehow.   :) for the humor impaired)

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                         http://www.allegro.com/sieler/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2