Needing a "business case" to fix an operating system bug just doesn't seem
right to me.  Asking for a new feature/enhancement, yes.  But this feature
us being used and should work correctly.  Come on HP!  You're better than
that.


At 11:51 AM 1/24/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Re:
>> Why would FINFO report a different maximum number of extents than LISTFILE?
>
>Because of a bug in the FLABELINFO intrinsic (it returns the wrong
>number for max extents).
>
>We submitted a call to the HP ESC (HP ITRC) on November 16, 2000,
>and by November 27, we'd convinced HP it really was a bug :)
>
>Call ID is 3100460068,  CR: JAGad38891, STARS SR No 8606169616.
>
>I'd suggest people submit bug reports mentioning this SR, because
>HP asked us to provide a business case for fixing it:
>
>   The lab engineer assigned to the SR ...
>   [would] also like a summary of the impact this difference
>   has on your business to submit with the SR so they can best
>   prioritize this request.
>
>Their "difference" is our "bug" :)
>
>
>
>Stan Sieler                                           [log in to unmask]
>www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.html          www.allegro.com/sieler
>
Ric
[log in to unmask]