Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:32:49 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Aug 4, 12:58pm, Eric Kundl wrote:
> btw, i notice a lot of programmers are still using the older intrinsics when
> there are native mode equivalents available. HPCICOMMAND in this case could
> have been used instead.
Both COMMAND and HPCICOMMAND are NM intrinsics. They also differ in
behavior: COMMAND should be used for system "services", like building
or purging a file. HPCICOMMAND should be used when a program wants to
allow CI-like access to its users. COMMAND does not search for UDCs;
whereas, HPCICOMMAND does. And, there are a few other differences.
> ...So my question is: if an application will never see an old MPE cpu,
> will only be run on an MPEiX cpu, is there any reason to not use the newer
> intrinsics?
In some cases the "older" interface is easier/simplier to call.
BTW, FOPEN is also a NM intrinsic.
Regards,
Jeff Vance, CSY
--
|
|
|