Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 29 Feb 2000 10:17:14 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
well, inspite of what your watch or pager might say...it's
certainly past monday :-) so (drum-roll) here are the
voting results...along with some 'comments'....
release the hp-ib drivers? 2 yes votes, 7 no votes. the
'no's have it! there was also one vote for finding some
sort of hardware (black-box-ish) solution. there were two
votes for enabling parallel printing. what is *very* clear
is the need for robust, dependable printing!
> The *right* answer is to address the printing issue. This is something
> HP heard quite loud and clear at the recent meetings. From HP's reaction I
> would anticipate that they will be doing something in this area to help
> customers resolve this problem. And I too believe that this is the right
> direction. It is certainly better to address the printer issues and move
> forward to the new bus architecture than carry along an outdated technology
> and continue to stay behind the other industry leaders.
>
> The big problem is the loss of CIPER protocol printing and the new HP
> printers not supported by the spooler. That's the issue that needs to be on the
> ballot.
>
(i'll add an 'amen' to that :-)
> make HP-IB go away
>
:-)
unless there are any violent disagreements (hi, denys :-) --
i'll think up some clever wording for another ballot item
and get it submitted. *but* this (imo) is really a sig
print issue, so i'm going to toss the ball over to steve
hammond. - d
--
Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631 [log in to unmask]
>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<
|
|
|