HP3000-L Archives

July 2009, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Craig Lalley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Craig Lalley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:01:39 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
Tracy,

Excellent link.  I know some very valuable COBOL programmers.  Laugh it you want, but it still a required skill set in some places.

-Craig


--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Tracy Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Tracy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: HP3000 Workers Chances Improving?
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 10:32 AM
> >From Slashdot last night. 
> Presume the hidden cost of letting HP3000
> workers go way back may also apply here.
> 
> (I think the original poster should have put 'not' before
> 'immediately'.)
> 
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Retired Mainframe Pros Lured Back Into Workforce 
>              
>    |
> |   from the
> come-back-so-we-can-fire-you-again dept.     
>           |
> |   posted by ScuttleMonkey on Friday July
> 10, @18:22 (Businesses)   |
> |   http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/07/10/200204 
>           |
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
> 
> [0]itwbennett writes "Businesses that cut experienced
> mainframe
> administrators in an effort to cut costs inadvertently
> created a skills
> shortage that is coming back to bite them. Chris O'Malley,
> CA's
> mainframe business executive VP, says that mainframe
> workers were let go
> because 'it had no immediate effect and the organizations
> didn't expect
> to keep mainframes around.' But businesses have kept
> mainframes around
> and now they are [1]struggling to find engineers. Prycroft
> Six managing
> director Greg Price, a mainframe veteran of some 45 years,
> put it this
> way:  'Mainframes are expensive, ergo businesses want
> to go to cheaper
> platforms, but [those platforms] have a lot of packaged
> overheads. If
> you do a total cost of ownership, the mainframe comes out
> cheaper, but
> since the costs of a mainframe are immediately obvious, it
> is hard to
> get it past the bean-counters of an organization.'"
> 
> Discuss this story at:
>     http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=09/07/10/200204
> 
> Links:
>     0. http://www.itworld.com/
>     1. http://www.itworld.com/%5Bprimary-term%
> 5D/70886/retired-mainframe-pros-lured-back-workforce
> 
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list
> settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> 

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2