Stan Sieler wrote:
>
> Re:
> > 1. Have HP review the raw list to determine which they will wish to
> ...
>
> Gavin already responded with a comment to the effect that that's
> what HP did this time.
>
> However, I think that's a bad idea.  If we can only vote for what
> we can get, how will HP ever know how much we want things they
> think they can't/wan't do?  It's important to be able to vote
> on the full SIB ballot.

While I appreciate your point, what difference does it really make if
HP/CSY isn't going to do the enhancement anyway?  In a way, it just
makes them look bad for now listening.

Besides, the individual SIG ballots still reflect all the things "we"
say we want, with these votes giving a pretty good indication of what's
important to more of "us".  From these, HP can pretty easily tell the
things we would want if all things were possible.

Richard
--
Richard L Gambrell, Director of Computing Systems and Networks
Information Technology Division
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
103 Hunter Hall, Department Code 4454
615 McCallie Ave., Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598
voice mail/cell phone: 423-432-5122
private e-mail: [log in to unmask]
UTC fax: 423-755-4150
UTC phone: 423-755-4551
UTC email: [log in to unmask]

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *